Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-1057•Michael Malry v. Montgomery County Board of Education
19-1057Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.10.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1057
MICHAEL MALRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:17-cv-01590-PX)
Submitted: September 30, 2019 Decided: October 10, 2019
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Malry, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock Karpinski, KARPINSKI, COLARESI &
KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Malry appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the
Defendant on his claims for discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment under
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012
& Supp. 2019), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634
(West 2018). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Malry v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Educ.,
No. 8:17-cv-01590-PX (D. Md. Dec. 12, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.