Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-7441•Don Mitchell Wilborn v. H. JOYNER, Warden
18-7441Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.11.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7441
DON MITCHELL WILBORN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
H. JOYNER, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 18-7443
WENDEL ROBERT WARDELL, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
H. JOYNER, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:18-cv-01565-DCN, 0:18-cv-01566-DCN)
Submitted: July 9, 2019 Decided: November 27, 2019
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Don Mitchell Wilborn, Wendel Robert Wardell, Jr., Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, federal prisoners Don Mitchell Wilborn and Wendel
Robert Wardell, Jr., appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the
magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice their 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petitions.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Wilborn v. Joyner, No. 0:18-cv-01565-DCN (D.S.C.
Nov. 8, 2018); Wardell v. Joyner, 0:18-cv-01566-DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.