Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-6421•Frederick Hamilton Banks v. JEFF SESSIONS, Attorney General; J.C. HOLLAND, Warden; BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER
18-6421Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.07.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6421
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JEFF SESSIONS, Attorney General; J.C. HOLLAND, Warden; BUTNER
FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:17-hc-02080-D)
Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 24, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, as well as its order denying Banks’ self-styled “motion to
vacate” under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Banks’ application to proceed
in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s orders. See Banks v. Sessions, No. 5:17-
hc-02080-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2017 & Apr. 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.