Kristian Taguinod v. Amazon.com Inc.

18-1305Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.05.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1305
KRISTIAN TAGUINOD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMAZON.COM INC.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.; MAHMOUD OMARI; MALIK
OMARI,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00276-HEH)
Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 30, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kristian Taguinod, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kristian Taguinod appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint,
filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(West 2012 & Supp. 2017), as time-barred, and denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Taguinod v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-00276-HEH
(E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 2017 & Mar. 15, 2018). We also deny Taguinod’s motion to assign
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.