William Anthony Taccino v. United States of America

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1294
WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ORGANIZING FOR ACTION WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Volunteer,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS AND
AGENCIES; PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD TRUMP; STATE OF
WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR JIM JUSTICE; STATE OF
MARYLAND; MARYLAND GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 18-1295
WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ORGANIZING FOR ACTION WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Volunteer,
Plaintiff,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS AND
AGENCIES; PRESIDENT OF THE U. S. A. DONALD TRUMP; STATE OF
WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR JIM JUSTICE; STATE OF
MARYLAND; MARYLAND GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02112-GLR)
Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: June 28, 2018
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
William Anthony Taccino appeals the district court’s orders adopting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of his
application for disability insurance benefits, and denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Taccino v. Comm’r Soc. Sec., No. 1:14-cv-02112-GLR (D.
Md. Jan. 18, 2018; Feb. 23, 2018). We deny Taccino’s motion for default judgment and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --