Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-1224•Lenir Richardson v. BELL PARTNERS, INC.; OFFICER PATRICK LENNOR, Alexandria City Police Department
18-1224Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.05.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1224
LENIR RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BELL PARTNERS, INC.; OFFICER PATRICK LENNOR, Alexandria City Police
Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00995-AJT-TCB)
Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 30, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. David Scott Bracken, DAVID S. BRACKEN, PC,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee Bell Partners, Inc.; George Arthur McAndrews,
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee Officer Patrick
Lennor.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lenir Richardson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions
to dismiss and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Richardson v. Bell Partners, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00995-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va., Feb. 16, 2018).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.