Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-1132•Jerry Wayne Boyd v. Island Creek Coal Company; Cnx Gas Company, LLC; Donald Allen McGlothlin, Jr.
18-1132Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.05.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1132
JERRY WAYNE BOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY; CNX GAS COMPANY, LLC; DONALD
ALLEN MCGLOTHLIN, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia,
at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:17-cv-04287)
Submitted: May 17, 2018 Decided: May 18, 2018
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Wayne Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Lena Lockridge Busscher, MCGUIREWOODS,
LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees Consol Island Creek Coal and CNX Gas
Company, LLC.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Wayne Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his
civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. The district court referred
this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The
magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Boyd that failure to file
specific, timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a
district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is
necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the
parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766
F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Boyd
has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.