Joseph Pirela v. JEFF ATKIN, Clerk of Court, Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 177- M53 Appeal

18-1025Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.04.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1025
JOSEPH PIRELA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFF ATKIN, Clerk of Court, Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 177-
M53 Appeal; ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN; HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, The
Congress of the United States of America; HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION OF
UNKNOWN BAR OF HOMOSEXUALS, (Sex Workers Transvestites-Prostitutes);
ALOYMA SANCHEZ; JUDGE THOMAS WILLIAMS; MIAMI POLICE
DEPARTMENT; THE STATE OF FLORIDA PROCEEDINGS
PROSECUTIONS; UNKNOWN BAR OF HOMOSEXUALS; TRANSVESTITES
UNKNOWN; SEX WORKERS 33 HEALTH CARE BAKER ACT OF JACKSON
HOSPITAL; (4) TRANSVESTITE MATTHEW JOHN, Prostitute Homosexual;
DAVID COUNTIN, (1) Client; DON SMITH; UNKNOWN TRANSVESTITE
BAR PROSTITUTE OF BAR OF HOMOSEXUALS UNKNOWN, (9); DENIS
FONSECA; ANGEL MIRANDA; CARLOS ALVAREZ; CITY OF MIAMI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:17-cv-00559-D)
Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Joseph Pirela, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Pirela appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Pirela v.
Atkin, No. 5:17-cv-00559-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.