Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-7201•Ton Julius Thomas v. ARMSTEAD, Warden; DAMION FAYALL; N. RAJA, Officer CO Two; DR. NERO, Director
17-7201Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.05.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7201
TON JULIUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARMSTEAD, Warden; DAMION FAYALL; N. RAJA, Officer CO Two; DR.
NERO, Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:16-cv-02737-CCB)
Submitted: March 20, 2018 Decided: May 2, 2018
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ton Julius Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Conrad Meister, Gina Marie Smith,
MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ton Julius Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
summary judgment, granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment, and denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Thomas v. Armstead, No. 1:16-cv-02737-CCB (D. Md. filed Aug. 28, 2017, & entered
Aug. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.