Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-6504•Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr. v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC
17-6504Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.10.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6504
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC; DAVID B. EVERETT, Regional
Operations Chief, VDOC Eastern Region; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA;
THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, Contractor with VDOC to operate and
manage LVCC employees and staff to provide medical care to plaintiff; E.
WRIGHT, Warden at LVCC; SHAW, Assistant Warden at LVCC (female);
SHAW, Assistant Warden at LVCC (male); FANT, Unit Manager of Building #50
and the Therapeutic Community Program of Addictions Treatment; DAVIS, Unit
Manager for Building #70; GRAVES, Unit Manager of Segregation; BOONE,
Supervisor of Segregation; GOODE, Health Services Administrator of the LVCC
Medical Department; KELLY, Law Library at LVCC; NURSE LUCY, Nurse;
UNKNOWN MEDICAL STAFF TO BE NAMED LATER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00086-RBS-DEM)
Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 27, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jessica Leigh Berdichevsky, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Thompson v. Clarke, No. 2:14-cv-00086-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.