Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-6367•Terrance Pevie v. JOHN WOLFE, Warden (J.C.I.); LA’TRICIA TAYLOR, Correctional Hearing Officer
17-6367Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.08.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6367
TERRANCE PEVIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN WOLFE, Warden (J.C.I.); LA’TRICIA TAYLOR, Correctional Hearing
Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:15-cv-03271-TDC)
Submitted: August 16, 2017 Decided: August 31, 2017
Before MOTZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrance Pevie, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terrance Pevie, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court’s order granting the
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pevie v. Wolfe, No. 8:15-cv-03271-
TDC (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2017). We deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.