Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-1654•Joseph Cornelius Ruddy, Jr.; Joanne C. Ruddy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
17-1654Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.06.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1654
JOSEPH CORNELIUS RUDDY, JR.; JOANNE C. RUDDY,
Petitioners - Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 14602-15L)
Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 25, 2018
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Cornelius Ruddy, Jr., Joanne C. Ruddy, Appellants Pro Se. Robert Joel Branman,
Melissa Briggs, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, Tax Division, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joanne C. Ruddy and Joseph Cornelius Ruddy, Jr., appeal the tax court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner on their petition seeking
review of the Commissioner’s notice of determination with respect to collection of their
2009 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Ruddy v. Comm’r,
Tax Ct. No. 14602-15L (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 22, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.