Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-1584•William Anthony Taccino v. Commissioner, Social Security
17-1584Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.11.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1584
WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-02775-JFM)
Submitted: September 18, 2017 Decided: November 13, 2017
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se. Gabriel Robert Deadwyler, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting defendant’s motion to dismiss his
civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec., No.
1:16-cv-02775-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.