Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-1578•Crescencio Perez-Perez v. M. E. RAY, Warden of FCI Estill, SC, as an individual
17-1578Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.08.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1578
CRESCENCIO PEREZ-PEREZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M. E. RAY, Warden of FCI Estill, SC, as an individual and in his official capacity;
C. E. FLOYD, Warden of FCI Estill, SC, as an individual and in his official
capacity; E. RAIN WATER, A.H.S.A, as an individual and in her official capacity;
DR. JOSE HERNANDEZ, Medical Officer, as an individual and in his official
capacity; B. PARINA, M.D., as an individual and in his official capacity; DR.
ROSS RAMES, M.D., as an individual and in his official capacity; CAROLYN V.
RICKARDS, Regional Director, as an individual and in her official capacity;
WENDY J. ROAL, Administrator National Inmate Appeals, as an individual and in
her official capacity; FREDERICK GOULDING,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (9:16-cv-03574-CMC)
Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 21, 2017
Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Crescencio Perez-Perez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Crescencio Perez-Perez appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perez-Perez v. Ray, No. 9:16-cv-
03574-CMC (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.