Fredicia Hardnett; Wilbert A. Hardnett v. M & Tbank; Atlantic Law Group; John Doe 1-10; Jane Doe 1-10

17-1538Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.10.2017

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1538
FREDICIA HARDNETT; WILBERT A. HARDNETT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
M & T BANK; ATLANTIC LAW GROUP; JOHN DOE 1-10; JANE DOE 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00622-MHL)
Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 23, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fredicia Hardnett, Wilbert A. Hardnett, Appellants Pro Se. Robert Miltz Luck, III, REED
SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Fredicia Hardnett and Wilbert A. Hardnett appeal the district court’s order
dismissing their suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Hardnett v. M&T Bank, No. 3:15-cv-00622-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 31 &
Sept. 19, 2016; Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.