Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-1536•Kobi J. Mullins v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.a.
17-1536Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.07.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1536
KOBI J. MULLINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.; SHUTTLEWORTH,
RULOFF, SWAIN, HADDAD & MORECOCK, PC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00841-REP)
Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: July 24, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kobi J. Mullins, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank, KAUFMAN & CANOLES,
PC, Richmond, Virginia; Michele Adams Mulligan, GOLIGHTLY MULLIGAN PLC,
Richmond, Virginia; Samuel I. White, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kobi J. Mullins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for
failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court. Mullins v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No.
3:16-cv-00841-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2017). We also deny Mullins’ motion to add a
party. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.