Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-1139•Peter K. Stern v. United States of America
17-1139Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.07.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1139
PETER K. STERN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00329-MR)
Submitted: June 27, 2017 Decided: July 14, 2017
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter K. Stern, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Peter Kay Stern appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for a writ of
error coram nobis and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stern v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-
00329-MR (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2016 & Jan. 12, 2017). We deny as moot Stern’s
motions for final judgment on the pleadings and to expedite the decision. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.