United States of America v. Edward Kermit Richards, Iii

16-7508Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.02.2017

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7508
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDWARD KERMIT RICHARDS, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:14-cr-00385-CCB-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2017 Decided: February 22, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Kermit Richards, III, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth
Sutherland Clark, Seema Mittal, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, Christopher John Romano,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Kermit Richards, III, appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion
for a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendments 782 and 794 to
the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Specifically, both of the
Guidelines Amendments under which Richards sought a sentence
reduction were in effect at the time of Richards’ February 2016
sentencing. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
See United States v. Richards, No. 1:14–cr–00385–CCB–1 (D. Md.
Oct. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.