Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-7180•Stephen Satcher v. DAVID WILSON, Warden
16-7180Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.01.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7180
STEPHEN SATCHER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DAVID WILSON, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:15-cv-00152-FPS-JES)
Submitted: January 20, 2017 Decided: January 30, 2017
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Satcher, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer,
Tara Noel Tighe, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen D. Satcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order declining to adopt the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on Satcher’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Satcher v. Wilson, No. 5:15-cv-00152-FPS-
JES (N.D. W. Va. July 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.