United States of America v. George Thomas Cabel, a/k/a PY

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7166
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GEORGE THOMAS CABEL, a/k/a PY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:97-cr-00173-TDS-1)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Thomas Cabel, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
George Thomas Cabel appeals from the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.* We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Cabel, No. 1:97-cr-00173-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 18,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court granted Cabel’s § 3582(c)(2)
motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce
Cabel’s sentence to the full extent he requested.

-- 2 of 2 --