Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-7065•United States of America v. Mustafa Muhammad
16-7065Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.01.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7065
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MUSTAFA MUHAMMAD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:14-cr-00055-REP-1)
Submitted: January 6, 2017 Decided: January 11, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mustafa Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Hart Mansfield,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mustafa Muhammad appeals the district court’s order
granting the motion of the United States for the return of
Jencks Act material. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. We note that an agreed discovery order
provided that the material would be returned to the United
States at the conclusion of the case. Accordingly, we affirm.
United States v. Muhammad, No. 3:14-cr-00055-REP-1 (E.D. Va.
May 17, 2016). We deny the motion for default judgment and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.