Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6997•Johnny Calvin Ollis v. Litonya Carter
16-6997Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.11.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6997
JOHNNY CALVIN OLLIS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LITONYA CARTER; GEORGE SOLOMON; KAREN BROWN; FAYE DANIELS;
DALE ATTAWAY; BRENDA DIXON; MAGOLEEN WILLIAMS; JERMAINE
HACKNEY; GARY PALUSH,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION, Department of Public Safety,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03248-BO)
Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Calvin Ollis, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Johnny Calvin Ollis appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012), the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the
Rehabilitation Act, for failure to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ollis v. Carter, No. 5:14-ct-03248-BO (E.D.N.C. July 14, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.