Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6996•Shan Edward Carter v. CARLTON JOYNER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
16-6996Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.12.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6996
SHAN EDWARD CARTER,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
CARLTON JOYNER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North
Carolina,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:16-hc-02107-D)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shan Edward Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shan Edward Carter appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice Carter’s motion to appoint counsel
for his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition that had not yet been
filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court. Carter v. Joyner, No. 5:16-hc-02107-D (E.D.N.C. June 28,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.