Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6989•Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson, a/k/a Charles Tyson v. ALAN WILSON, Attorney General SC
16-6989Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.12.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6989
CHARLES KEVIN BRUCE TYSON, a/k/a Charles Tyson,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ALAN WILSON, Attorney General SC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(6:16-cv-01232-DCN)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Tyson v. Wilson, No. 6:16-cv-01232-DCN (D.S.C.
June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.