Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6856•United States of America v. Manoj Kumar Jha
16-6856Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.11.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6856
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MANOJ KUMAR JHA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1)
Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Manoj Kumar Jha, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Manoj Kumar Jha appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for a new trial and denying his motion for
reconsideration of the order granting the Government an extension
of time to file a response. We have reviewed the record and find
no abuse of discretion by the district court and no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Jha, No. 1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1 (D.
Md. June 13, 2016). We deny Jha’s motion for sanctions and his
motion to vacate this court’s decision in United States v. Jha,
613 F. App’x 212 (4th Cir. 2015) (No. 14-4717). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.