Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6761•United States of America v. Mark C. Busack
16-6761Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.11.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6761
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MARK C. BUSACK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:14-cr-00054-FPS-JES-1)
Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark C. Busack, Appellant Pro Se. Jarod James Douglas, Erin
Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorneys, William J.
Ihlenfeld, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark C. Busack appeals the district court’s order granting
the Government’s motion to authorize payment of restitution from
Busack’s inmate account and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United State v. Busack, No.
5:15-cr-00054-FEP-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 18 & May 27, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.