Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6638•Sam Frederick v. United States of America
16-6638Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.09.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6638
SAM FREDERICK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(9:15-cv-02699-MGL)
Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016
Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sam Frederick, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sam Frederick appeals the district court’s order accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the United States
summary judgment on Frederick’s malpractice action, brought
pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346,
2671–2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2016). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. Frederick v. United States, No.
9:15-cv-02699-MGL (D.S.C. Apr. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.