United States of America v. Jan Stevens

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6610
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JAN STEVENS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:10-cr-00446-LO-3)
Submitted: October 20, 2016 Decided: November 3, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jan Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Kellen Sean Dwyer, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jan Stevens appeals the district court’s order denying his
post-judgment motion to correct a clerical error. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Stevens, No. 1:10-cr-00446-LO-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 18,
2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --