Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6585•Chris Murray v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General
16-6585Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.08.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6585
CHRIS MURRAY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General; IMMIGRATION AND
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT - (ICE); UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-03865-TDC)
Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chris Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chris Murray appeals the district court’s order granting
the Government’s motion to dismiss in his action seeking
mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court. Murray v. Lynch, No.
8:14-cv-03865-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.