Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6363•United States of America v. Oronde S. Mabry, a/k/a Oronde’ Sylvester Mabry
16-6363Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.08.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6363
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ORONDE S. MABRY, a/k/a Oronde’ Sylvester Mabry,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:07-cr-00028-REP-2)
Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oronde S. Mabry, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Oronde S. Mabry appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir.
2013) (reviewing district court’s decision under § 3582(c)(2)
for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mabry,
No. 3:07-cr-00028-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.