Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6336•Glynndeavin Von Fox v. South Carolina Judicial Department
16-6336Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.08.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6336
GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(2:16-cv-00209-RMG)
Submitted: August 16, 2016 Decided: August 24, 2016
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glynndeavin von Fox, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Glynndeavin von Fox appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismissing his case. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma
pauperis on appeal and dismiss von Fox’s appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. von Fox v. S.C. Judicial Dep’t, No.
2:16-cv-00209-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.