Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6093•Dontay Carter-El v. Scott S. Oakley
16-6093Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.08.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6093
DONTAY CARTER-EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCOTT S. OAKLEY; ROBIN WOOLFORD; LENORA ADEGBESAN; PAULA
WILLIAMS; WARDEN FRANK BISHOP; LT. BRAD WILT; WARDEN RICHARD
GRAHAM, JR.; JAMES TICHNELL, Case Manager; CAPT. BUTLER,
Investigations,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-02545-JFM)
Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dontay Carter-El, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dontay Carter-El appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and
denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Carter-El v. Oakley, 1:14-cv-02545-JFM
(D. Md. filed Nov. 10, 2015 & entered Nov. 12, 2015; filed
Jan. 11, 2016 & entered Jan. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.