Samuel Litvin Michaels v. Nancy A. Berryhill

16-2242Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.09.2017

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2242
SAMUEL LITVIN MICHAELS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00388-RJC-DSC)
Submitted: August 29, 2017 Decided: September 21, 2017
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert A. Whitlow, Christian R. Ayers, SELLERS, AYERS, DORTCH & LYONS, P.A.,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, United States
Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Gill Beck, Assistant United States Attorney,
Asheville, North Carolina, David Mervis, Special Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Litvin Michaels appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner of Social
Security’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We
have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the administrative record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Michaels v. Berryhill, No. 3:15-cv-00388-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 26,
2016 and entered Sept. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.