Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-2042•Sidney B. Harr v. N. LORRIN FREEMAN; WAKE COUNTY, in the State of North Carolina
16-2042Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.12.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2042
SIDNEY B. HARR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
N. LORRIN FREEMAN; WAKE COUNTY, in the State of North
Carolina,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:16-cv-00199-FL)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sidney B. Harr, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr.,
Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sidney B. Harr appeals the district court’s order granting
N. Lorrin Freeman’s motion to dismiss Harr’s civil rights claims
against Freeman. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. See Harr v. Freeman, No. 5:16-cv-00199-FL (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.