Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1911•Lenir Richardson v. O. J. FAULK, Officer, badge 2908
16-1911Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.01.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1911
LENIR RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
O. J. FAULK, Officer, badge #2908; D. N. CUSTER, Officer,
badge #3756; OFFICER RIZZA; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY; MARIO
TORRES, Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: December 9, 2016 Decided: January 9, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Pace Baucom,
Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lenir Richardson appeals the district court’s orders denying
her motion to remand and dismissing her complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Faulk,
No. 1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2015; July 13, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.