Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1846•Sidney B. Harr v. RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, President
16-1846Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.12.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1846
SIDNEY B. HARR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, President; DUKE UNIVERSITY, c/o Pamela
J. Bernard, General Counsel; ASSOCIATED PRESS; DAVID F.
LEVI, Dean,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00304-CCE-JLW)
Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sidney B. Harr, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sidney B. Harr appeals the district court’s order
dismissing on res judicata grounds his civil action against
Defendants, and imposing a prefiling injunction against and
sanctions on Harr. We have reviewed the record and found no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Harr v. Brodhead, No. 1:16-cv-00304-
CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.