Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1624•In re: William Douglas Hampton
16-1624Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.10.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1624
In re: WILLIAM DOUGLAS HAMPTON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:15-cv-00464-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Douglas Hampton, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Douglas Hampton petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has failed to comply with this
court’s mandate to transfer several motions to the docket of his
pending declaratory judgment action. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. Our review of
the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has
complied with the directions of our mandate. See Hampton v.
Fed. Corr. Complex Petersburg, No. 1:15-cv-00318-CMH-TCB (E.D.
Va. Apr. 6, 2016). Accordingly, because the district court has
already taken the action Hampton requests, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.