Martha M. Stevenson; James Stevenson v. Ethicon, Incorporated; Johnson & Johnson

16-1621Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.11.2016

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1621
MARTHA M. STEVENSON; JAMES STEVENSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ETHICON, INCORPORATED; JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,
District Judge. (2:12-cv-02700; 2:12-md-02327)
Submitted: November 4, 2016 Decided: November 10, 2016
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tracy W. Houck, Ron Riggle, HOUCK & RIGGLE, LLC, Ruston,
Louisiana, for Appellants. David B. Thomas, Daniel R.
Higginbotham, THOMAS COMBS & SPANN, PLLC, Charleston, West
Virginia; Christy Jones, John C. Henegan, Sr., Susana Moore

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Moldoveanu, BUTLER SNOW, LLP, Ridgeland, Mississippi, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Martha M. Stevenson and James Stevenson appeal the district
court’s orders dismissing this action for failure to timely
effect service of process and denying their motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Stevenson v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-
cv-02700; 2:12-md-02327 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 26, 2016; May 27,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.