Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1415•Renee Louise McCray v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.a.
16-1415Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.12.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1415
RENEE LOUISE MCCRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03445-GLR; 13-26131; 13-00710)
Submitted: October 28, 2016 Decided: December 9, 2016
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Renee Louise McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Michael S. Barranco,
Douglas Brooks Riley, TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, PA, Towson,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Renee Louise McCray appeals the district court’s orders:
(1) adopting the bankruptcy court’s proposed findings of fact
and conclusions of law and dismissing her civil action, and
(2) denying her postjudgment motions for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. McCray v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:14-cv-03445-GLR;
13-26131; 13-00710 (D. Md. Oct. 14, 2015; Mar. 30, 2016; Apr. 8,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.