Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1352•Starsha Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, in care of Chicago Title Insurance Company, Milestone…
16-1352Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.09.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1352
STARSHA SEWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, in care of Chicago Title
Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC; CHICAGO TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY; MILESTONE TITLE, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 16-1354
STARSHA SEWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, in care of Chicago Title
Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-03077-PWG; 8:15-cv-03392-PWG)
Submitted: September 9, 2016 Decided: September 13, 2016
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael William Tompkins,
FIDELITY NATIONAL LAW GROUP, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing these civil actions and denying her motions for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Sewell v. Fidelity Nat’l Financial,
Inc., Nos. 8:15-cv-03077-PWG; 8:15-cv-03392-PWG (D. Md. Oct. 23
& Nov. 19, 2015; Jan. 5, Feb. 24, Mar. 22 & Mar. 24, 2016). The
motions to strike the supplemental appendix and to seal are
denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.