Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1204•Kenneth L. Sanford v. City of Franklin Va
16-1204Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.08.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1204
KENNETH L. SANFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF FRANKLIN VA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:15-cv-00521-RAJ-RJK)
Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth L. Sanford, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen Kailani Memmer,
Johneal M. White, GLENN, ROBINSON & CATHEY PLC, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth L. Sanford appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Sanford v. City of Franklin, VA,
No. 2:15-cv-00521-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2016). We deny
Sanford’s motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.