Patricia Flanigan v. Fayetteville State University

16-1170Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.09.2016

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1170
PATRICIA FLANIGAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 16-1171
PATRICIA GRIFFIETH FLANIGAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00448-FL; 5:15-cv-00527-FL)
Submitted: August 24, 2016 Decided: September 13, 2016
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kirk J. Angel, ANGEL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Concord, North Carolina,
for Appellant. Roy Cooper, North Carolina Attorney General,
Stephanie A. Brennan, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Griffieth Flanigan appeals the district court’s
order granting Fayetteville State University’s motions to
dismiss her harassment and retaliation claims, brought pursuant
to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42
U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have considered the
parties’ arguments and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Flanigan v. Fayetteville State Univ., Nos. 5:15-cv-00448-FL,
5:15-cv-00527-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.