Chantale Teta Maffo v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

16-1153Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.10.2016

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1153
CHANTALE TETA MAFFO,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of An Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals
Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Godwill C. Tachi, THE TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland,
for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy, Shelley R.
Goad, Assistant Director, Julia J. Tyler, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION
LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Chantale Teta Maffo, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen as untimely and
numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record
and Maffo’s claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse
its discretion in denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)
(2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009).
We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board. See In re Maffo (B.I.A. Jan. 19, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.