Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1112•Daniel B. Carroll v. Vinnell Arabia, LLC.
16-1112Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.09.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1112
DANIEL B. CARROLL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VINNELL ARABIA, LLC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00815-JCC-JFA)
Submitted: August 22, 2016 Decided: September 1, 2016
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel B. Carroll, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Michael Leland,
KING & SPALDING, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Susan Rebecca Podolsky,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel B. Carroll appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter the district
court’s judgment granting Vinnell Arabia, LLC’s motion to
dismiss his complaint raising claims under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. Carroll v. Vinnell Arabia, LLC,
No. 1:15-cv-00815-JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.