Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1031•Kenneth Lee Holbert, Jr. v. Greenville Technical College
16-1031Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.10.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1031
KENNETH LEE HOLBERT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GREENVILLE TECHNICAL COLLEGE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:15-cv-04615-HMH)
Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth L. Holbert, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth A. Davis, Shawn
Davis Eubanks, BOYKIN DAVIS & SMILEY, LLC, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Lee Holbert, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Holbert v. Greenville Tech.
Coll., No. 6:15-cv-04615-HMH (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 2015). We grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.