Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-7500•Richard T. Mays v. KEITH WHITENER, Superintendent
15-7500Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.02.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7500
RICHARD T. MAYS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KEITH WHITENER, Superintendent; DANNY FREEMAN, Unit
Manager; TONI BANKS, Assistant Unit Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00268-FDW)
Submitted: February 16, 2016 Decided: February 23, 2016
Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard T. Mays, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard T. Mays appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Mays v. Whitener, No. 1:14-cv-00268-FDW
(W.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2015). We deny Mays’ motion for injunction,
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.