Benjamin K. Quarmon v. JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden

15-7261Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.11.2015

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7261
BENJAMIN K. QUARMON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:15-cv-00210-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin K. Quarmon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin K. Quarmon seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies
identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing
of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Quarmon
seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar
Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.