Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-7204•United States of America v. Noe Pineda-Albarron, a/k/a Primo, a/k/a Pedro Martinez Flores, a/k/a Noe Albarron-Pineda
15-7204Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.02.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7204
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NOE PINEDA-ALBARRON, a/k/a Primo, a/k/a Pedro Martinez
Flores, a/k/a Noe Albarron-Pineda,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon,
Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00029-NKM-1)
Submitted: January 26, 2016 Decided: February 1, 2016
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Noe Pineda-Albarron, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Noe Pineda-Albarron appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Pineda-Albarron, No. 3:10-cr-00029-NKM-
1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.