Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-7124•Brian Wilson v. M. HOPE BLACKLEY, Spartanburg County Clerk of Court
15-7124Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.10.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7124
BRIAN WILSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
M. HOPE BLACKLEY, Spartanburg County Clerk of Court,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
SPARTANBURG COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(2:15-cv-00869-MGL)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Brian Wilson appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Wilson v. Blackley,
No. 2:15-cv-00869-MGL (D.S.C. filed June 30, 2015 & entered
July 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.