Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-7061•United States of America v. Jose Breton-Pichardo, a/k/a Rolando Berberena
15-7061Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.09.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7061
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOSE BRETON-PICHARDO, a/k/a Rolando Berberena,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:03-cr-70006-SGW-9)
Submitted: September 29, 2015 Decided: September 30, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Breton-Pichardo, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb
Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harrisonburg,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jose Breton-Pichardo appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Breton-Pichardo, No. 5:03-cr-70006-SGW-
9 (W.D. Va. May 28, 2015; June 24, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.